tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7461948747659071092.post1175171693078605775..comments2023-09-29T02:49:02.989-07:00Comments on An Emphatic Umph: Repetition, and Pedagogy, via KierkegaardDaniel Coffeenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03912050391869734890noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7461948747659071092.post-9210892782915182752011-02-19T14:50:51.701-08:002011-02-19T14:50:51.701-08:00The quotes actually comes from SK's book calle...The quotes actually comes from SK's book called, Repetition. The stuff on Socratic vs. Christian pedagogy comes from Philosophic Fragments.<br /><br />In Different and Repetition, Deleuze invokes and compares Kierkegaardian repetition and Nietzschean repetition. Kierkegaard, Deleuze claims, leaps to repeat — it's a matter of these vertical jumps. Nietzsche, however, dances along the surface — leaps are for buffoons. <br /><br />Now, what the fuck does that mean? My guess is as good as yours.Daniel Coffeenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03912050391869734890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7461948747659071092.post-70538824674467458622011-02-19T11:00:21.326-08:002011-02-19T11:00:21.326-08:00Are all these Kierkaard quotes from Philosophic Fr...Are all these Kierkaard quotes from Philosophic Fragments? I never knew he<br />Wrote about repetition like this.<br /><br />Do you think that this indicates that kierkegaard anticipated Deleuze view of repetition or is this something totally DIFFERENT?<br /><br />If their views are the same then<br />is Delueze recalling Kierkegaard or is he repeating him or maybe replacing him? What going on here?dustygravelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01877215902611486889noreply@blogger.com